Tribunal issues warning to deter doubtful SDLT claims
The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) recently rejected an appeal from a company that a building was “non-residential” due to it being in a state of disrepair. However, it also issued a warning to deter future cases. What’s the full story?

Henderson Acquisitions Ltd purchased a property after the occupant died, paying the residential rates of stamp duty land tax (SDLT). Shortly after this, Mr Henderson (a director of the company) visited the property and found that the kitchen ceiling had partially collapsed due to a leak. The damage affected less than half of the property, with the other half being safe to use whilst the damage was repaired. The central heating system needed to be replaced and there were multiple issues with the electrics that presented a fire hazard. Due to the issues with this property, a firm called Stamp Duty Savers advised Mr Henderson that the property was not suitable for use as a dwelling, lower rates of SDLT should have been paid and a claim was lodged for a repayment. HMRC disagreed and the matter was referred to the FTT.
The appeal was dismissed because the FTT found that only part of the building had fallen into a state of disrepair; the company did not purchase a non-residential property and turn it into a dwelling.
The FTT also included the following warning to deter further cases on this point “We consider it important that there be a further published decision on this issue in order to protect taxpayers such as the appellant from being persuaded to make unmeritorious claims for repayment of SDLT contrary to the purpose and intention of the statutory provisions.”
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?