Tax charity warns of hidden refund company trap
The Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG) has called on HMRC to step in to prevent tax refund companies from unfairly claiming fees from taxpayers. What’s going on?

The UK has one of the longest tax codes in the world so it’s no surprise that many taxpayers overpay. For example, they may be unaware of the nuances of the marriage allowance and so not claim it, or they may work in an industry where they are entitled to claim a flat-rate expense for clothing and have not asked to have their PAYE code adjusted. Many of these taxpayers will assume that an accountant is too expensive, so they appoint a tax refund company to handle a claim on their behalf.
Tax refund companies tend to target specific types of taxpayer who are likely to be owed refunds, e.g. healthcare workers, or those who are within the construction industry scheme. Sometimes, the company will insist that the taxpayer signs a deed of assignment so that the refund is paid to them, rather than the taxpayer. The company then pays the taxpayer the net amount. This is a legitimate method of practice, but the LITRG has discovered that some companies are using deeds which cover “any other refunds” due to the taxpayer regardless of whether the company has been involved in claiming it. The company will still deduct a fee. Extreme care should be taken when signing up to these services to ensure individuals don’t end up trapped in an arrangement that may be difficult to escape from. The LITRG has called on HMRC to intervene and pay close attention to whom it is making payments to. It has also updated its guidance regarding refund companies.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined ÂŁ40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?