Match of the Day for HMRC?
HMRC has been targeting media personalities with the IR35 rules, with partial success. Two more high profile cases have been heard. Who were the winners and losers?

The IR35 rules kick in where a worker provides their services through an intermediary, usually, but not always a limited company. Significant tax and NI savings can be realised if this structure is successful. However, HMRC often views such engagements as a sham with the worker being an employee in all but name. The IR35 rules apply if, in the absence of the intermediary, the worker would be an employee of the engaging entity. A number of high profile media personalities have had their employment statuses challenged in recent years.
Gary Lineker has presented Match of the Day for the BBC since 1999. He has also undertaken occasional work for BT Sports. His tax affairs came under the spotlight when it was reported that HMRC was pursuing him for a sum in the region of £5 million. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) was that the contracts were made directly between Mr Lineker and the engaging partners in his capacity as a partner of a general partnership. He had correctly declared his income as a share of partnership income (less a fixed allocation to his partner). As there was a direct contract, IR35 could not apply to the arrangement.
The news for Eamonn Holmes was less cheering. The Upper Tribunal has upheld the FTT’s decision that his arrangements were inside IR35; largely due to the degree of control the engager (ITV) had over the format and content of the shows Mr Holmes presented.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?