HMRC corrects guidance on company-owned EV car charging
Occasionally, HMRC publishes guidance that is at odds with what the legislation says. A recent example of this is in respect of reimbursement for the costs of charging company-owned electric vehicles. What’s the full story?

The tax and NI rules surrounding wholly electric vehicles (EVs) are more generous than for other company cars. This treatment extends to reimbursement of costs incurred by an employee in charging the EV. However, until recently HMRC’s guidance stated that where an company-owned EV was available for private use, any reimbursement is taxable as earnings. But this is inconsistent with a specific exemption in the legislation. There is also currently no specific fuel benefit for EVs, as HMRC does not consider electricity a fuel.
HMRC’s guidance at EIM23900 has now been updated to make clear that “The exemption under s.239(2) ITEPA 2003 means there is no separate charge to tax under the benefits code where an employer reimburses an employee for the cost of electricity to charge their company car at home.” The NI position is the same. However, HMRC does state that employers must ensure that the reimbursement made towards the cost of the electricity is solely for the company car.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?