HMRC appeals Lineker decision
Several months ago, Gary Lineker celebrated a win over HMRC regarding his tax affairs. However, that was unlikely to be the end of the story. What are the latest developments?

Perhaps unsurprisingly, following HMRC’s loss at the First-tier Tribunal (FTT), it isn’t giving up on its dispute with Gary Lineker (L). It has appealed against the decision made by the First-tier Tribunal in favour of Gary Lineker. The outcome of this case is important for any person considering providing their services through an intermediary where IR35 is in question. The tax involved is around £3.5 million but that’s the tip of the iceberg. Also at stake are fundamental issues regarding the efficacy of the IR35 rules. HMRC’s appeal to the Upper Tribunal was inevitable given that it stands to win even if it loses.
The crux of the dispute is whether the contract for L’s work was between himself alone or on behalf of the partnership with his former wife. If HMRC wins and there’s no appeal from L, it gets the money and may also confirm that the IR35 rules work as intended. Whereas, if it loses it has a case to demand the lost tax from the BBC and BT Sport (although time limits may prevent this) who agree the contracts with L. In case of a loss it’s also likely that the government will act quickly to rewrite the IR35 rules to prevent the loophole uncovered in the FTT. This case is important for both sides and it might yet go to a penalty shoot-out in the Court of Appeal or even the Supreme Court.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?