Cryptocurrency investors under HMRC scrutiny
HMRC has obtained information about those who have bought or sold cryptocurrencies and says it will be writing to them in November. How should someone respond if they receive a letter?

HMRC has said it will send so-called “nudge letters” to anyone for whom it’s been sent information from cryptocurrency brokers. It says the purpose of the letters is to remind taxpayers “to review their transactions to ensure that they are declared correctly”.
Any difference in the buying and selling price of cryptocurrencies is generally subject to the capital gains tax rules, either as a taxable gain or loss. Tax will only be payable where all capital gains less capital losses for the year exceed the annual exemption. However, transactions should be reported on self-assessment tax returns if their value exceeds certain limits or losses were made.
In some circumstances buying and selling cryptocurrencies counts as trading income in which case any amount of profit (or loss) is subject to income or corporation tax rules and must be reported to HMRC.
Information from HMRC about when cryptocurrency capital gains or losses should be declared is available here. For HMRC’s detailed guidance on the taxation of cryptocurrency transactions look here.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?